The article uses the following evaluative metrics to assess the state of every country’s stance on cybersecurity: “Protecting People and Infrastructure,” “Generating Capacity,” “Building Partnerships,” “Codifying Roles and Responsibilities,” and “Communicating Clear Policy.” Based on these metrics, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States excel in their strategy, while Germany, Japan, and South Korea are behind. The article addresses limitations in the study’s methodologies and acknowledges that there is not a “one-size-fits-all” approach to cybersecurity. After analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of every country, the article concludes with the following recommendations “Improve incentives for private-sector cybersecurity,” “Invest in making cyber risk assessment more transparent and measurable,” “Avoid overreliance on certifications,” “Expand private-sector cybersecurity assistance beyond financial aid,” “Foster trust between public and private sectors in incident response,” ” Emphasize the cyber needs of vulnerable populations,” “Cultivate a stronger cybersecurity workforce,” and “Specify accountabilities and establish clear metrics for implementation.” The authors hope that these suggestions are sufficient in an evolving digital landscape.
